RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01400
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Fitness Assessment (FA) failures, dated 22 Nov 11 and 25 Jan
13, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System
(AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her test on 22 Nov 11 was completed on an outside track that was
later found to be one-fourth of a mile too long. This track is
no longer being used.
Her test on 25 Jan 13 was not completed in accordance with AFI
26-2905, Fitness Program. Her waist measurement was taken
during a breath and not after a breath cycle.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of technical sergeant.
The applicants last seven FA scores are as follows:
DATE SCORE
1 May 13 SATISFACTORY
* 25 Jan 13 UNSATISFACTORY
15 Jun 12 EXEMPT
1 Mar 12 SATISFACTORY
* 22 Nov 11 UNSATISFACTORY
3 May 11 SATISFACTORY
20 Oct 10 SATISFACTORY
*Contested FA score.
On 6 Nov 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB)
disapproved the applicants request to remove her FAs dated
22 Nov 11 and 25 Jan 13. The specific reason for denial was
there was insufficient evidence to support the claim (Exhibit
C).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that the evidence
provided is insufficient to support the applicants claim. The
applicant did not provide any documentation to support the basis
for her request.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 6 Dec 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2013-01400 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Feb 13.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 26 Sep 13, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Nov 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01755
For non-AGR ARC, Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted. In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4). In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.1, The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days (90 days for ARC), but...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00433
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01302
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01302 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 09 Jan 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 09 Jan 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 70.88,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01407
A Standard FM 600, Record of Medical Care, dated 1 Nov 2012, indicates the applicant visited the Medical Treatment Facility, for chest pain and shortness of breath. His medical provider diagnosed him with Acute Bronchospasm, secondary to overexertion in a cold environment with a documented sinus infection. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, dated 26 June 12, paragraph 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00610
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of letters from his medical care providers and SF Forms 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care. We note in a memorandum dated 21 Nov 13, the applicants group commander restored the applicants grade to TSgt based on additional medical evidence that was not provided at the time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00694
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00694 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His demotion from the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt/E-6) to the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5) be rescinded. The applicants most recent FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 4 Apr 13 87.25 Satisfactory 21 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078
A list of the applicants last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802
The applicants last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...